[image:221:l] Not surprisingly Dick Cheney has again revealed himself as a detached, arrogant dick of Mobian proportions.
From Huffington Post
Satan’s gruff handmaiden and partner in inconceivable moral indecencies was on with the Wolfman on CNN and responded to criticism, indeed the thought of anyone even criticizing him regardless of content, thusly.
Wolfy stated and asked the following?
Here’s what Jim Webb, senator from Virginia said in the Democratic response last night — he said, “The president took us into this war recklessly. We are now, as a nation, held hostage to the predictable and predicted disarray that has followed.”
And it’s not just Jim Webb; it’s some of your good Republican friends in the Senate and the House are now seriously questioning your credibility, because of the blunders and the failures. Gordon Smith…
CHENEY: Wolf, Wolf, I simply don’t accept the premise of your question. I just think it’s hogwash.
He doesn’t accept the premise of the question therefore he doesn’t have to engage in rational defense, of which he knows he can’t win. Plus in the mind of this elitist, ceo sodomizing, half human-half avatar of unpronouncable evil of lore hybrid, crticism is just hogwash. Forget the content, and definitely forget a reasoned response. he doesn’t have to have reasons. He’s Vice president with a capitol V for vice and a master of treachery and deceipt. It’s what he does. It’s who he is. Don’t question him.
On not finding Bin Laden he had this to say. “Well, he’s — obviously, he’s well hidden. We’ve been looking for him for some time…he’s not putting out videos, the way he did oftentimes in the past.”
So if he were say a porn star we’d have him? Or maybe getting airplay on VH1? Oooh he’s hiding. The most advanced technological and surveillence backbone any nation has ever possessed just can’t deal with a man playing hiding and seek. Oh yeah and we were more concerned with oil in Iraq. Fuck 9-11.
Some other nuggets of pathological evil from Satan’s better half.
CHENEY: We have successfully defended the country for over five years against any further attack. They’ve tried, we know, repeatedly — the president talked about it last night in his speech.
Then of course it’s true. Just like when in last years speech Bush said we’d never raise troop levels in Iraq.
We know they tried last summer to capture airliners coming out of the UK and to blow them up over the United States or over the Atlantic. There have been numerous attacks have been disrupted.
Yeah but not by us or our half-assed Homeland Security dept. And of course there’s no proof of most of the other claims of thwarted attacks.
If you had asked, shortly after 9/11, what the odds were that we could go better than five years without another attack on the homeland, I don’t think anybody would have been willing to take that bet.
Really? Considering there had been only 1 other, both at the WTC, in hundreds of years, I think I woulld have taken that bet. Actually I predicted we’d seen the last of it in America for at least a few years right after 9-11 when everyone was panicking and letting Cheney run rampant over civil liberties and Iraq.
On Hussein:
CHENEY: He had corrupted the entire effort to try to keep him contained. He was bribing senior officials of other governments. The Oil-for-Food Program had been totally undermined. And he had, in fact, produced and used weapons of mass destruction previously, and he retained the capability to produce that kind of stuff in the future.
Only when he had English and American help. But let’s forget that and make sure it doesn’t come up in his trial by not trying him for most of what he did since it would embarrass us and our chief ally.
BLITZER: How worried are you of this nightmare scenario, that the U.S. is building up this Shiite-dominated Iraqi government with an enormous amount of military equipment, sophisticated training, and then in the end, they’re going to turn against the United States?
CHENEY: Wolf, that’s not going to happen. The problem is, you’ve got –
BLITZER: They’re — warming up to Iran and Syria right now.
CHENEY: Wolf, you can come up with all kinds of what-ifs; you’ve got to be deal with the reality on the ground. The reality on the ground is, we’ve made major progress. We’ve still got a lot of work to do. There’s a lot of provinces in Iraq that are relatively quiet.
If they dealt with reality on the ground this wouldn’t be happening because it was they who didn’t listen to all the what-ifs to begin with.
But the biggest problem we face right now, is the danger than the United States will validate the terrorist’s strategy, that in fact what will happen here, with all of the debate over whether or not we ought to stay in Iraq, where the pressure is from some quarters to get out of Iraq, if we were to do that, we would simply validate the terrorist’s strategy, that says the Americans will not stay to complete the task –
Again, it’s the weak-kneed liberals fault if we fail. Just like in Vietnam. Amazing how that always works that way.
CHENEY: That we don’t have the stomach for the fight. That’s the biggest threat.
Oh my fucking god!
BLITZER: Do you think Hillary Clinton would make a good president?
CHENEY: No, I don’t.
BLITZER: Why?
CHENEY: Because she’s a Democrat.
You’re the Socrates of our time Dick. What a reasoned debate.
On John McCain:
BLITZER: He said, the other day — he said, “The president listens too much to the vice president. Of course, the president bears the ultimate responsibility, but he’s been very badly served by both the vice president and, most of all, the secretary of Defense.” That was John McCain.
CHENEY: So?
Touche Dick. Touche.
BLITZER: He said, about the former Defense secretary, “Rumsfeld will go down in history, along with NcNamara, as one of the worst secretaries of Defense –”
CHENEY: I just fundamentally disagree. You heard my speech, when Don retired. I think he’s done a superb job.
You heard me. I said he was good. Therefor he’s good. I’m the Vice president. I’m filthy rich. Who are the critics to criticize me. If I say something that should be the end of it.
BLITZER: You know, we’re out of time, but a couple of issues I want to raise with you: your daughter, Mary. She’s pregnant. All of us are happy she’s going to have a baby. You’re going to have another grandchild. Some of the — some critics are suggesting — for example, a statement from someone representing Focus on the Family, “Mary Cheney’s pregnancy raises the question of what’s best for children. Just because it’s possible to conceive a child outside of the relationship of a married mother and father doesn’t mean that it’s best for the child.” Do you want to respond to that?
CHENEY: No.
BLITZER: She’s, obviously, a good daughter –
CHENEY: I’m delighted I’m about to have a sixth grandchild, Wolf.
And obviously I think the world of both my daughters and all of my grandchildren. And I think, frankly, you’re out of line with that question.
BLITZER: I think all of us appreciate –
CHENEY: I think you’re out of line.
BLITZER: We like your daughters. Believe me, I’m very sympathetic to Liz and to Mary. I like them both. That was a question that’s come up, and it’s a responsible, fair question.
CHENEY: I just fundamentally disagree with you
In other words it’s not something he can reconcile with his base so like anything else he can’t handle talking rationally about, most things that is, he doesn’t want to talk about it. He’ll continue to use that base who do nothing but talk about it though when it comes to other people and galvanizes right wing voters.
Let’s wind up with the soft stuff (ph)– Nancy Pelosi. What was it like sitting with her last night as opposed to Dennis Hastert?
CHENEY: I prefer Dennis Hastert, obviously. I like having a fellow Republican in the Speaker’s chair. Nancy’s now the speaker of the House. We had a very pleasant evening.
Translation: I hate her for being different and I raped her until she bled and begged for mercy. If she talks we’ll kill her children.



Recent Comments