Some thoughts because I care…
…about myself.
I see these tv commercials calling new cars the cars of the future or futuristic like a current Toyota add. I'm sorry but do they fly? Do the doors open upwards? Are they fueled by the screams of children? Well then it's not the future I was promised.
Technically no car is futuristc. Nothing is if its currently available. But as far as cars go it's not worthy of the 21st century unless it flys. I was led to believe this was possible as a child and I will except no less.
—————–
Speaking of commercials have you seen these new Heineken adds with the jingle singing, "Don't you wish your girlfriend looked good like me, don't you wish your girldfriend was fun like me…?" THey play this as they show images of the slender green bottle which is clearly cast in the role of subject of the tune. Isn't this really taking the whole beer as transference thing to new lows? Do I want my girlfriend to be shaped like a bottle, cold and hard to the touch, perspering with moisture and making me feel stupid and dizzy when I engage it?
Been there done that.
Put down the beer and talk to your girlfriend.
—————–
I'm just going to say this and I don't care what anyone thinks of me. When it comes to 2008 I want Al Gore to run and win the Presidency. Say what you will about him but he's the smartest, hippest, most ethical, and forward thinking politician I know of. Including both Clintons. For god's sake people hjis daughter wrote for Futurama! I think there would be a sense of poetic justice to it all. It'd also be the best way to send the world the messege that we're sorry, we made a big mistake allowing this to happen over the past few years, and we're setting it right and restoring things to where they should have been, but with an unfortunate and deeply shameful 8 year gap that we'll try to make up for.
THe only way to get people on our side again might be to give them a collective reason to believe we're politically admitting our mistake and casting it all on the Bush administration. THey will be the scapegoats, although for once that human habit of finding such an animal to bear the brunt of our problems will be much deserved.
Maybe we can all step oout of our showers as a nation and just pretend it never happened. That'll be easier with Gore. He is our political Patrick Duffy. We killed him off and we know we made a mistake. Let's make him President before he goes on to a bad sitcom with Suzanne Somers.
It's time Gore was a noun again, the name of our President, instead of being a verb describing our President's foreign policy.
——————
Met prospect Lastings milledge is up tonight because Xavier Nady had an emergency appendectomy. I'm looking forward to seeing the kid but I bring this up here to discuss such needless appendages as the the appendix and our tonsils. I guess Bob's hypotheses regarding the 4 toed statue on lost also got me thinking about this. But will our toes, tonsils, oor appendix be eliminated by evolution? I don't think this is really certain or a sign of a more evolved and selected for being.
If we continue to get our tonsils and appendixes removed are we in some way cutting elvolution off at the pass and artificially not allowing it to work its magic? DO we have to not let people with bad tonsils and appendixes breed, or let them die in order to eliminate these vestigial artifacts? Or would that just naturally select for the ones that dont get infected and cause problems?
If people with the weak tonsils and appendixes still breed why would natural selection eliminate them? Does it get rid of useless stuff or jsut harmful stuff. If they're not killing us it seems evolution dismisses the whole subject once we are born and set off in the world.
Same thing with that missing toe. If its just useless is that enough for natrual selection to get rid of it?
I mean if uselessness got rid of genetic lines would we have civil servants? People who stop for yellow traffic lights? Yankee fans? Mariah Carey?
Ok I guess I have to give it a thousand years or so. i'll get back to you.
———————-
Perceptions can be kind of useless too if they're not honed. I've ben way off in the past because I've let my poor self image effect the way I think others perceive me. Later I've found out otherwise. Usually its too late, especially with women. That got me to wondering about that thing with the woman in Hannaford a few weeks back.
One of the contributing bits of evidence was not only that but her recent coldness with a friend who is a manager in the agency where she works. THen I got to thinking. He's been in management meetings where he's really stood out and shined, clearly marking himself as a cut above those colleagues present. This includes that aforementioned woman.
So what if she feels intimidated by the both of us and that explains her behavior. She is reportedly introverted, therefore most probably has esteem issues. Many in her position have that psychological tendency to worry that they are not good enough to be in position of authority and that they will be exposed. What if my friend (who she knows is connected to me) has not felt her aloofness or distance because he has mentioned me to her and thinks he's trying to put the word in, as I thought, but in fact feels as if he's exposing her inadequacy. She has no reason to feel that way. She's very good at her job and a bright, well-spoken person, from what I've seen. But when you have the esteem issues and responsibility that stuff can go out the window. More than many of us are a bundle of issues coloring our views of ourselves and others.
And if that's true maybe she feels intimidated by me, my rugged good looks, and scintillating wit and charm.
Fuck you I do too sometimes have the wit and charm thing. Maybe not the good looks, but I'm no beast yet, and I can make the ladies dig me at times. Unfortunately I always find that out too late.
Anyway maybe I should be operating under the -shes feeling inferior and unworthy of my attentions and can't imagine I'd be interested-theory, rather than the-i suck and may get desperate enough to date a born again Christian again before my closing window of opportunity slams shut-theory.
I'd say its still 60-40 in favor of the latter theory but it could go either way. Does this mean I'm going to ask her out?
Probably not. But I may take more advantage of an opportunity
such as the Hannaford gig in the unlikely event one comes up again.
———-
I've been noticing alot that drivers behind me have been suddenly disappearing. I'm worried something strange could be happening or I may be making people go away who get too close to me.
They can't all be turning off as fast as they've been vanishing. I mean they are there one second and gone the next. Some of those times I'm pretty sure we weren't even passing a recent turnoff. And yet whoosh! Like magic I look ahead and a second or two later look back in the rearview and it's gone.
WHere are these people going. Is invisibility technology really that advanced. Maybe Lost is onto something. Are these cars cloaked in some kind of negative refraction index electromagnetic shield? Are they popping into cornfields because I don't like to be followed? Is there an evil force in the land abducting motorists, and will I be next?
Important questions all.




Recent Comments