Daily Archive for August 28th, 2005

Fomenting Terrorists?

I love the English. Let me make that clear. I fantasize about moving to London someday, kneel at every ironic and haughty utterance that comes from their humor and film, and think women with English accents (well i guess any accent really) exponentially increase their sexiness quotient. But what’s up with all the hating going on?

Hate crimes are up 600% in England from this time a year ago due mostly to the fallout from the July bombings there. Tony Blair and co have passed legislation to deport Arabs. Home Secretary Charles Clarke has published a list of activities, that like our own Patriot Act, has been crticized by civil and human rights groups, and leaves alot of leeway for abuse. These rules will encompass articles and websites that preexisted the bombings and target their authors. Arabs like Mohammed al-Massari with websites carrying images of attacks on British troops in Iraq will likely face deportation under the new guidelines. Said Clarke, “Individuals who seek to create fear, distrust and division in order to stir up terrorist activity will not be tolerated by the government or by our communities.” Hell, War Of The Worlds kind of does that doesn’t it? Under that provision I guess Bush wont be visiting England again anytime soon huh? Kind of exactly what he did to the red states to get them to hate Iraq and Democrats.

Clarke added that, “preachers of intolerance and hatred,” will not be tolerated. Imagine that here? There goes Christian fundamentalism. Pack your bags Falwell. Want Chavez assasinated Pat Robertson? How about we deport you to Venezeula and you two can work out your difficulties together? Imagine how many local churces would be looking for help. Without intolerance and hatred they pretty much don’t have a function until they get to gloat on Rapture day.

When does someone take a look at history and find out what really foments their hatred of all us “infidels?” Could the decades of the U.S. making Israel thier largest source of foreign aid which helped subsidize the extermination and occupation of Palestinians possibly be a factor? Might not out current soiree in Iraq have similar effects? Sayyid Qutb is regarded amongs many as one of the fathers of radical Islam. Where did his awakening occur and when? While going to school in the U.S. where he arrived in 48 when Israel was created. He attributed much of his thinking to seeing American racism at work and watching the world turn a blind eye to what was being done to the Palestinians at that point. Later he was tortured in Egypt for his beliefs and associations and came to see the torturers as subhumans who were expendable. These mutated later into the infidels, of which most of us now fit, according to him and his descendents.

I don’t defend this guy. He was as much of a nut as Robertson and the growing lunatic fringe making up the hate groups that hide behind different religious denominations and those unwatchable cable channels where ugly people with bad makeup and big hair do alot of praising while they make more money. But what makes the nuts? Sure their own religion is as faulty and poisoned as ours, maybe more so, but it has always been Western interference, oppression, and aiding of Israel that has been a prime recruitment tool for terrorist groups. With England’s reactionary response as well as our own continued oblivious disregard for reality and facts on the ground, more and more people realize we’re not even getting safer in the short term, much less the long. Al Qaeda now uses footage of our work in the area including Abu-Ghraib to lure more people into the fold of player hating. While our own military’s numbers go down, Bin Ladens troops prospered not only in Afghanastan where their fearless leader was most probably on the ropes until we pulled forces out and ran to Iraq, but worldwide.

The London non profit and non partisan think tank IISS, a leading authority on global conflict and military matters, wrote last year and printed at Salon’s site, that Al Qaeda, has more than 18,000 militants in its ranks from 60 countries and that ranks have grown since Iraq. Here’s a quote from the report:

“Overall, risks of terrorism to Westerns and Western assets in Arab countries appeared to increase after the Iraq war began in March 2003. With the miilitary invasion and occupation of Iraq, the United States sought to change the political status quo in the Arab world to advance the American strategic and political interests. Al Qaeda seeks, among other things, to purge the Arab and larger Muslim world of U.S. influence. Accordingly, the Iraq intervention was always likely in the short term, to enhance jihadist recruitment and intensify al Qaeda’s motivation to encourage and assist terrorist operations.”

Now long term who knows for certain how this will all go? But if things go accordant with history there are many young Muslim kids watching their families die and suffer brutally as they go without basic amenities, seeing the worlds racial and religious intolerance of them grow, heard about or seen images of our troops desecrating their holy places and gunning down innocents, incarcerating and torturing their people, and generally interfering in other people’s homes. The unspoken neo-con justification is most probably that by the time these kids get older they’ll be under Western control, bathing in our amenities and the glories of globalization. That or they’ll just be under contol. I agree that people will generally forgive alot and sell out for profit and comfort. Beliefs are as strong as the deprivation that breeds them, for the most part, but I’m not so certain our efforts will produce such joys. Have they here? How much hate permeate the hearts and minds of militia members, religious fundamentalists, racists, gang members, skin heads and many more in America? Doesn’t matter where propaganda and brainwashing end up directing it, it’s there, and in the Arab world those inevitable pockets of hate and deprivation will not breed those who rail out about terrorists, blacks , Hispanics, godless liberals, or their wives, but will instead be directed at us. And only us.

For more on Qutb and his revelence to this issue see another great Naomi Klein column from The Nation.

The Poll Tolls For Thee

A slew of new poles are emerging this week that put His Fraudulency’s approval rating at numbers between 36 and 40%. THese include tha Harris pole and American Research Institute studies. This is pretty damn low and almost unheard of for a standing President. Washington Post.

Alot of this has to do with Iraq according to those polls. Some is the economy. Now I seem to remember us America hating liberals warning some of these new dissenters from the ways of the Bushmen over just these areas over the past few years. Do liberals learn faster? Do some folk just vote for the incumbent in times of war and yearn to complain about it later though they would change nothing? The facts were there all along. Common sense and history was there to warn us all along. Speaking of historians click HNN to see how more than 8 of 10 of them rate this administration a failure.

As much as liberal haters bemoan our negativity and lack of what they think is patriotism, its amazing how much time backs us up. That adherence to pesky facts over emotional reactions has a way of winning the day. The truth will out, as the Bard once said.

But to put these rating in perspective think of this: during the summer of 73 and the Watergate scandal Nixon had a 39% approval ranking! Tricky Dicks got W beat. Last time prince George was sagging emarrissingly low in approval ratings it took a terrorist attack to make him look appealing. Watch your backs America. Well watch your back in the blue states anyway. Ironic that the states no one could care less about targeting were the ones crying about keeping his royal highness on the throne he inherited with an 8 year delay so he could protect them from Muslims presumable hitting such highly volatile spots as monster truck rallies. And yet those red states also get alot of pork with their share of funding for homeland security. Well they do have a closer relationship to god in them parts so maybe the muslims will want to take the battle directly to his followers and cut out us middlemen.

Unfortunately this wont end like Nixon since the press is far more corporate than ever. There won’t be impeachment proceedings because even Democrats don’t have the stomach or the principles to stand on adn fight. Plus by going after Clinton the way they did for a cum stain the Pubs have declawed that tool and will turn it into a tit for tat Dem form of vengeance. As far as i’m concerned treason should be the debatable charge here and impeachment a given.

Can it get lower than 36%? That’ll be hard. If so we’ll be watching something special taking place and it will be interesting to see how the cons (sans the neo), handle it.